Comparative Analysis of the Housing Situation in Selected EU Countries

Authors

  • Weronika Wójciaczyk Studia Doktoranckie, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2016.0951.0306

Keywords:

housing, housing in different EU countries, housing needs, living conditions

Abstract

The goal of this article was to verify whether housing policies influence the existing housing situation in a given country. To that end, the housing situation in selected EU countries is presented and compared. The housing policies that were and are in force in these countries are described. The goal stems from the belief that some programmes and government measures are more effective in solving housing problems. The countries chosen are very different in terms of their approach to housing policies, showing the full spectrum of possible approaches – from supporting the rental segment in Germany, to the preferences for private property in Spain. The first part of the article presents housing policies in selected EU countries using the available literature on the topic. To compare the housing situation in the various countries, it was necessary to apply quantitative and qualitative indicators, which were designed using existing statistical data. As a result of the analysis, it was possible to confirm the impact of the housing policies on the housing situation in the selected countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams D. [2011], The ‘Wicked Problem’ of Planning for Housing Development, „Housing Studies”, vol. 26, nr 6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2011.593128.

Alberdi B., San Martin I. [2004], Policy and Market Responses to Affordability in Spain, „Housing Finance International”, vol. 18, nr 4.

Bischoff O., Maennig W. [2011], Rental Housing Market Segmentation in Germany according to Ownership, „Journal of Property Research”, vol. 28, nr 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2010.538477.

Bråmå Å., Andersson R. [2010], Who Leaves Rental Housing? Examining Possible Explanations for Ethnic Housing Segmentation in Uppsala, Sweden, „Journal of Housing & The Built Environment”, vol. 25, nr 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10901-010-9179-4.

Cesarski M. [2003], Reprodukcja mieszkaniowego majątku trwałego w procesach społeczno-gospodarczych. Polska i kraje OECD – 1960–2000, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie, Warszawa.

Dominiak W. [1998], Systemy oszczędnościowo-kredytowe na mieszkanie w krajach europejskich i w Stanach Zjednoczonych, Instytut Gospodarki Mieszkaniowej, Warszawa.

Driant J., Li M. [2012], The Ongoing Transformation of Social Housing Finance in France: Towards a Self-financing System?, „International Journal of Housing Policy”, vol. 12, nr 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2012.651337.

Eastaway M.P., San Martin Varo I. [2002], The Tenure Imbalance in Spain: The Need for Social Housing Policy, „Urban Studies”, vol. 39, nr 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980120102975.

Frańczuk M. [2013], System Rent to Buy a Home – „wynajmij, żeby wykupić”. Podstawowe zasady działania systemu, porównanie na tle prawa polskiego, „Świat Nieruchomości”, nr 84, http://dx.doi.org/10.14659/worej.2013.84.05.

Gorczyca M. [2002], Polski dystans mieszkaniowy. Przyczyny i warunki jego pokonywania w procesie integracji z Unią Europejską, Z Prac Zakładu Badań Statystyczno Ekonomicznych, z. 282, Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Warszawa.

Grudziński A. [1991], Propozycje polityki standardowe w warunkach gospodarki rynkowej, Instytut Gospodarki Mieszkaniowej, Warszawa.

Hedin K., Clark E., Lundholm E., Malmberg G. [2012], Neoliberalization of Housing in Sweden: Gentrification, Filtering, and Social Polarization, „Annals of the Association of American Geographers”, vol. 102, nr 2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.620508.

Housing and Environmental Conditions in Post-communist Countries [2007], red. B. Komar, B. Kucharczyk-Brus, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice.

Housing Europe Review 2012: The Nuts and Bolts of European Social Housing Systems [2011], CECODHAS Housing Europe’s Observatory, Brussels.

Housing Statistics in the European Union 2010 [2010], OTB Research Institute for the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, The Hague.

Martínez M.T.S. [2005], Distributive Aspects of Public Expenditure on Housing in Spain, „European Journal of Housing Policy”, vol. 5, nr 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14616710500342127.

Navarro C., Ayala L. [2008], Multidimensional Housing Deprivation Indices with Application to Spain, „Applied Economics”, vol. 40, nr 5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036840600722323.

Przeszłość i przyszłość polskiej polityki mieszkaniowej [2005], red. L. Frąckiewicz, Instytut Pracy i Spraw Socjalnych, Instytut Gospodarki Nieruchomościami, Warszawa.

Raport 2006 o naprawie sytuacji mieszkaniowej [2007], http://www.kongresbudownictwa.pl/pliki/Streszczenie%20A.pdf (dostęp: 16.09.2015).

Schaefer J. [2003], Financing Social Housing in France, „Housing Finance International”, vol. 17, nr 4.

Ström S. [2010], Housing and First Births in Sweden, 1972–2005, „Housing Studies”, vol. 25, nr 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02673031003711519.

Strzępek I. [2012], Warunki mieszkaniowe w Polsce na tle krajów Europejskich, „Świat Nieruchomości”, nr 1(79).

Turek B. [2013], Ponad 53 miliony dorosłych Europejczyków mieszka z rodzicami [w:] Mieszkalnictwo w roku rodziny. Raport CBOS oraz ekspertyzy i opinie w sprawie sytuacji mieszkaniowej Polaków, Kongres Budownictwa, Habitat for Humanity Poland, Fundacja Bezdomnych, Warszawa.

Voigtländer M. [2009], Why Is the German Homeownership Rate So Low?, „Housing Studies”, vol. 24, nr 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02673030902875011.

Downloads

Published

2016-08-26

Issue

Section

Articles