Stimulants of and Barriers to Co-operation between Entrepreneurs and Research Entities Engaging in Innovative Projects

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2023.1000.0203

Słowa kluczowe:

research and development activities, commercialisation of R&D, co-operation between research institutions and business, innovation

Abstrakt

Objective: The aim of this paper is to identify the most important factors supporting and hindering co-operation between entrepreneurs and research entities engaging in innovative projects. Co-operation is aimed at generating technical, IT, or process innovations, while the most common partners of choice for entrepreneurs are research entities that are part of universities. Decisions concerning such co-operation should be based on three key factors: analysis of the company’s potential, forecasting of future possible outcomes and information on funding opportunities. These assumptions are the basis for diagnosing the barriers that lead to the abandonment of co-operation. Factors that facilitate such co-operation are also identified.

Research Design & Methods: A survey was conducted among business entities engaged in manufacturing and service activities with high and medium-high technologies from the Lower Silesian Voivodship. The most important factors limiting and supporting the propensity for research collaboration were then analysed with the use of descriptive statistics and statistical inference (Fisher’s test).

Findings: The research identifies barriers that should be neutralised in order to develop research cooperation between enterprises and universities. Paths to facilitating cooperation that could be developed by local and central authorities are also indicated.

Implications / Recommendations: An uncomplicated model co-operation agreement binding both parties in partnership should be developed. Attitudes in academia towards co-operation with business need to be radically changed, because researchers are primarily motivated to publish high-scoring publications in reputable journals instead of co-operating with business. Unlike researchers, entrepreneurs’ main motivation is to quickly generate cash flow. Neither side focuses on developing unique high-end innovations in co-operation with one another. There is a lack of commercialisation-oriented interaction between research entities and business. Statistical studies reveal a need for research entities to embrace the principles of business. Helping them do so will allow for the development of effective research co-operation.

Contribution: The article is intended to broaden the knowledge of the current state of co-operation between entrepreneurs and scientific institutions and to lay out recommendations for developing research cooperation.

Pobrania

Statystyki pobrań niedostępne.

Bibliografia

Bartosińska D., Jankiewicz-Siwek A. (2006), Metoda reprezentacyjna i jej wybrane zastosowania w badaniach społeczno-gospodarczych, “Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio H. Oeconomia”, vol. 40.

Canestrino R., Carayannis E. G., Magliocca P. (2022), The Noncontextual Drivers of Innovation: Development and Validation of the 5H-INN Survey, “IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management”, https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3159373.

Chiarini A., Belvedere V., Grando A. (2020), Industry 4.0 Strategies and Technological Developments. An Exploratory Research from Italian Manufacturing Companies, “Production Planning & Control”, vol. 31(16), https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2019.1710304.

Cichosz M., Wallenburg C. M., Knemeyer A. M. (2020), Digital Transformation at Logistics Service Providers: Barriers, Success Factors and Leading Practices, “The International Journal of Logistics Management”, vol. 31(2), http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2019-0229.

Cinar E., Trott P., Simms C. (2019), A Systematic Review of Barriers to Public Sector Innovation Process, “Public Management Review”, vol. 21(2), https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473477.

Conlé M., Kroll H., Storz C., Brink T. ten (2023), University Satellite Institutes as Exogenous Facilitators of Technology Transfer Ecosystem Development, “The Journal of Technology Transfer”, vol. 48, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09909-7.

Dagnino G. B., Picone P. M., Ferrigno G. (2021), Temporary Competitive Advantage: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review and Research Directions, “International Journal of Management Reviews”, vol. 23(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12242.

Fischer B., Guerrero M., Guimón J., Schaeffer P. R. (2021), Knowledge Transfer for Frugal Innovation: Where Do Entrepreneurial Universities Stand?, “Journal of Knowledge Management”, vol. 25(2), https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2020-0040.

García-Quevedo J., Segarra-Blasco A., Teruel M. (2018), Financial Constraints and the Failure of Innovation Projects, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, vol. 127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.029.

Godina R., Ribeiro I., Matos F., Ferreira B. T., Carvalho H., Peças P. (2020), Impact Assessment of Additive Manufacturing on Sustainable Business Models in Industry 4.0 Context, “Sustainability”, vol. 12(17), https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177066.

Gontareva I., Litvinov O., Hrebennyk N., Nebaba N., Litvinova V., Chimshir A. (2022), Improvement of the Innovative Ecosystem at Universities, “Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies”, vol. 1(13(115)), https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.251799.

Hájek P., Stejskal J. (2018), R&D Cooperation and Knowledge Spillover Effects for Sustainable Business Innovation in the Chemical Industry, “Sustainability”, vol. 10(4), https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041064.

Heaton S., Lewin D., Teece D. J. (2020), Managing Campus Entrepreneurship: Dynamic Capabilities and University Leadership, “Managerial and Decision Economics”, vol. 41(6), https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3015.

Heaton S., Siegel D. S., Teece D. J. (2019), Universities and Innovation Ecosystems: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective, “Industrial and Corporate Change”, vol. 28(4), https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtz038.

Huber F., Wainwright T., Rentocchini F. (2020), Open Data for Open Innovation: Managing Absorptive Capacity in SMEs, “R&D Management”, vol. 50(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12347.

Isaksen A., Trippl M., Kyllingstad N., Rypestøl J. O. (2021), Digital Transformation of Regional Industries through Asset Modification, “Competitiveness Review”, vol. 31(1), https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-12-2019-0140.

Jakimowicz A., Rzeczkowski D. (2019), Diversification of Innovation Strategies of Polish Industrial Processing Enterprises Depending on Their Size after the Global Financial Crisis, “Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation”, vol. 15(4), https://doi.org/10.7341/20191542.

Kiefer C. P., Río González P. del, Carrillo-Hermosilla J. (2019), Drivers and Barriers of Eco-innovation Types for Sustainable Transitions: A Quantitative Perspective, “Business Strategy and the Environment”, vol. 28(1), https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2246.

Lee S. M., Trimi S. (2021), Convergence Innovation in the Digital Age and in the COVID-19Pandemic Crisis, “Journal of Business Research”, vol. 123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.041.

Medda G. (2020), External R&D, Product and Process Innovation in European Manufacturing Companies, “The Journal of Technology Transfer”, vol. 45(1), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9682-4.

Oeij P. R. A., Torre W. van der, Vaas F., Dhondt S. (2019), Understanding Social Innovation as an Innovation Process: Applying the Innovation Journey Model, “Journal of Business Research”, vol. 101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.028.

Opršal Z., Harmáček J., Vítová P., Syrovátka M., Jarecka-Stępień K. (2021), Polish and Czech Foreign Aid: A ‘Mélange’of Geopolitical and Developmental Objectives, “Journal of International Relations and Development”, vol. 24, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-020-00192-x.

Parker R., Lundgren P. (2022), The Role of Universities in Transformative Innovation Policy, “Science and Public Policy”, vol. 49(2), https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab070.

Raposo M., Fernandes C. I., Veiga P. M. (2022), We Dreamed a Dream That Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Can Promote Sustainability, “Management of Environmental Quality”, vol. 33(1), https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-01-2021-0010.

Roh T., Lee K., Yang J. Y. (2021), How Do Intellectual Property Rights and Government Support Drive a Firm’s Green Innovation? The Mediating Role of Open Innovation, “Journal of Cleaner Production”, vol. 317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128422.

Rosli A., Cacciolatti L. (2022), The Role of Universities in the Development of the Local Knowledge Base: Supporting Innovation Ecosystems through Skills Development and Entrepreneurship, “International Journal of Intellectual Property Management”, vol. 12(1), http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJIPM.2022.121018.

Shyrokykh K. (2022), European Development Co-operation via Technical Assistance: An Outside-in Perspective, “JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies”, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13420.

Smith G., Sochor J., Karlsson I. M. (2019), Public–private Innovation: Barriers in the Case of Mobility as a Service in West Sweden, “Public Management Review”, vol. 21(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1462399.

Staniulyte J. (2022), Towards the Entrepreneurial University: The Principal-agent Problem, “Quality & Quantity”, vol. 56(5), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01246-z.

Steen M., Hansen G. H. (2018), Barriers to Path Creation: The Case of Offshore Wind Power in Norway, “Economic Geography”, vol. 94(2), https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953.

Szücs F. (2018), Research Subsidies, Industry–university Cooperation and Innovation, “Research Policy”, vol. 47(7), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.009.

Vargo S. L., Akaka M. A., Wieland H. (2020), Rethinking the Process of Diffusion in Innovation: A Service-ecosystems and Institutional Perspective, “Journal of Business Research”, vol. 116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.038.

Pliki dodatkowe

Opublikowane

2023-09-07

Numer

Dział

Artykuły