Option Pricing Theory and Game Theory - A Comparison of Credit Risk Management Tools

Authors

  • Andrzej Paliński AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, Department of Applied Computer Science

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2015.0937.0108

Keywords:

bank, credit, interest rate, risk management

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to determine whether the theoretical models derived from option pricing theory and game theory correctly determine the interest rate on bank loans. First, the interest rates were calculated from the option model developed by Moody's-KMV. Obtained in this way, interest rates were compared with the real interest rate on bank loans of Polish publicly listed companies. It turns out that the theoretical interest rate is generally much lower than the actual one. A model built on the basis of the game theory and the concept of the liquidation value was then used, and on that basis theoretical interest rates were calculated using Monte Carlo simulation. In this case, divergence of the theoretical loan rates from the actual ones also proved significant. It seems that, in setting interest rates, Polish banks use many factors, not only the market values of company assets and their volatility.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Byström H. [2006], Merton Unraveled: A Flexible Way of Modeling Default Risk, „Journal of Alternative Investments", vol. 8, nr 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jai.2006.627849.

Benmelech E., Garmaise M., Moskowitz T. [2005], Do Liquidation Values Affect Financial Contracts? Evidence from Commercial Loan Contracts and Zoning Regulation, „Quarterly Journal of Economics", vol. 120, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/qje/120.3.1121.

Benmelech E., Bergman N. [2008], Liquidation Values and the Credibility of Financial Contract Renegotiation: Evidence from U.S. Airlines, „Quarterly Journal of Economics", vol. 123, http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1635.

Crosbie P., Bohn J. [2003], Modeling Default Risk - Modeling Methodology, Moody's KMV Company, New York.

Crouhy M., Galai D., Mark R. [2000], A Comparative Analysis of Current Credit Risk Models, „Journal of Banking & Finance", vol. 24, nr 1-2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0378-4266(99)00053-9.

Hull J., Nelken I., White A. [2003], Merton's Model, Credit Risk, and Volatility Skews, „Journal of Credit Risk", vol. 1, nr 1.

Merton R. [1974], On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates, „Journal of Finance", vol. 29, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1974.tb03058.x.

Noetzel P. [2011], Strukturalne i zredukowane modele pomiaru ryzyka kredytowego wykorzystywane w praktyce bankowej, „Ekonomia i Zarządzanie", nr 1.

Paliński A. [2013a], Analiza ekonomicznych warunków umowy kredytowej w ujęciu teorii gier, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Katowice.

Paliński A. [2013b], Loan Payment and Renegotiation: The Role of the Liquidation Value, SSRN Working Papers, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2325424.

Paliński A. [2013c], Wpływ wartości likwidacyjnej aktywów firmy na oprocentowanie kredytu - badania polskich spółek giełdowych, „Bank i Kredyt", nr 2.

Wójciak M., Wójcicka A. [2007], Porównanie modyfikacji Byströma modelu opcyjnego oceny ryzyka kredytowego z modelem MKMV, Dynamiczne Modele Ekonometryczne - X Ogólnopolskie Seminarium Naukowe, Toruń.

Zarządzanie ryzykiem [2008], red. K. Jajuga, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles