Analysis of Shale Gas Exploration and Production Regulations - Lessons from Poland, Canada and the US

Authors

  • Anna Gapys Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie Studia Doktoranckie Wydziału Ekonomii i Stosunków Międzynarodowych

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2014.0925.0104

Keywords:

Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA), raw material policy, concessions, regulation methods

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to review the theoretical and practical aspects of regulations concerning the exploitation of natural resources. Raw material policy is a public project, and therefore a decision tool known as Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) should be applied.  A nation's ownership of minerals is in practice frequently contested. Non-democratic governments have very often sought to collect revenues from natural resource exports in order to build their private fortunes. Such abuses are observed even today. The article begins with a short theoretical discussion about CBA. It then presents the issue of ownership of natural resources from the perspective of international law as well as the phenomenon of resource nationalism. The following section looks at the policy of granting concessions, a common tool used in regulating access to raw materials for exploration and production (E&P) companies. The empirical part of the paper analyses shale gas regulations in Poland, while also examining both the restrictiveness of rules adopted in this country and the legal preparedness of the Polish authorities to begin to use shale gas on a mass scale. Key findings of this part are enhanced with lessons from shale gas production in the US and Canada.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ciechanowska, E. (2012), W jaki sposób najlepiej opodatkować wydobycie gazu łupkowego w Polsce? "Dziennik Gazeta Prawna", 6 August, http://www.kpmg.com/pl/pl/issuesandinsights/articlespublications/strony/w-jakis-posob-najlepiej-opodatkowac-wydobycie-gazu-lupkowego-w-polsce.aspx (31.12.2012).

Click, R. W. and Weiner, R. J. (2010), Resource Nationalism Meets the Market: Political Risk and the Value of Petroleum Reserves, "Journal of International Business Studies", nr 41.

Concessions (2008), "OECD Journal, Competition Law and Policy", vol. 1-2.

Defending Marcellus Shale Groundwater Contamination Claims: The Case against Class Actions and Other Theories of Liability, R. G. Mullady Jr, S. J. Doyle, Ch. A. Fitzpatrick IV, A. M. Guarino (2012), "Defense Counsel Journal", vol. 79, nr 2.

Duruigbo, E. (2006), Permanent Sovereignty and People's Ownership of Natural Resources in International Law, "The George Washington International Law Review", vol. 38, nr 1.

Dziadul, J. (2011), Podatek od surowców - czy to ma sens? "Polityka", 7 December, http://www.polityka.pl/rynek/gospodarka/1521729,1,podatek-od-surowcow---czy-to-ma-sens.read#ixzz1tkNgDb98 (31.12.2012).

Gapys, A. (2010), Ekspansja i działania monopolistyczne Gazpromu - wnioski dla Polski, „Nauka i Gospodarka", nr 3.

Gess, K. N. (1964), Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources: An Analytical Review of the United Nations' Declaration and Its Genesis, "International and Comparative Law Quarterly", vol. 13.

Howell, A., Loh, P. K. and Yuen, P. (2009), Tips on Dealing with Concessions, "International Financial Law Review", Euromoney Trading Limited, London.

Jefferies, C. (2012), Unconventional Bridges over Troubled Water - Lessons To Be Learned from the Canadian Oil Sands as the United States Moves to Develop the Natural Gas of the Marcellus Shale Play, "Energy Law Journal", vol. 33/75.

Kurasz, J., Roguski, A. and Baca-Pogorzelska, K. (2011), Podatki od kopalin słuszne, ale..., "Rzeczpospolita", 30 November, http://www.rp.pl/artykul/762253.html (31.12.2012).

Ostrowski, R. (2011), Należne za znaleźne. Narodowy plan zagospodarowania złóż gazu łupkowego, "Polityka", 22 June, http://www.polityka.pl/rynek/gospodarka/1516340,2,narodowy-plan-zagospodarowywania-zloz-gazu-lupkowego.read?print=true#ixzz25s0tfRTo (31.12.2012).

Podmioty posiadające koncesje na poszukiwanie i rozpoznawanie ropy naftowej i gazu ziemnego - łącznie konwencjonalnych i niekonwencjonalnych (shale gas) (2012), Ministerstwo Środowiska, http://www.mos.gov.pl/g2/big/2012_09/3ce38279b5b982e918c4ee2c233f51ea.pdf (31.12.2012).

Revesz, R. L. (1997-1998), The Race to the Bottom and Federal Environmental Regulation: A Response to Critics, 82 MINN. L. REV.

Rose, E. A. (2004), OPEC's Dominance of the Global Oil Market: The Rise of the World's Dependency on Oil, "The Middle East Journal", vol. 58, nr 3.

Rutkowska-Subocz, E. (2011), Poszukiwanie i wydobywanie gazu łupkowego i zaciśniętego w Polsce - aspekty prawne, "Czysta Energia", nr 2.

Sarnoff, J. D. (1997), The Continuing Imperative (But Only from a National Perspective) for Federal Environmental Protection, „Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum", vol. VII, nr 2.

Snow, N. (2008), Producers, Regulators Aaddress Marcellus Shale Gas Challenges, "Oil & Gas Journal", vol. 106, nr 42.

Surdej, A. (2008), Metoda analizy kosztów i korzyści: imperatyw efektywności w politykach publicznych [w:] Środowisko i warsztat ewaluacji, PARP, Warszawa.

Gaz łupkowy w Polsce [Shale gas of Poland] (2012), PMR, http://www.pmrconsulting.com/pl/a8/gaz-lupkowy-w-polsce (31.12.2012).

Ustawa o podatku od wydobycia niektórych kopalin [Certain minerals extraction tax act] z dn. 2 marca 2012, Dz.U. RP isap.sejm.gov.pl/Download?id=WDU20120000362 &type=2 (31.12.2012).

Ustawa prawo geologiczne i górnicze z dn. 9 czerwca 2011, http://www.mos.gov.pl/g2/big/2011_0 /856261f5941ef74d75680ba05043a9d9.pdf (31.12.2012).

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles