The EU Factor as a Determinant of Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment to Poland, Czech Republic and Hungary

Authors

  • Czesława Pilarska Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Katedra Mikroekonomii
  • Grzegorz Wałęga Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Katedra Mikroekonomii

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2015.0945.0905

Keywords:

foreign direct investment, EU accession, transition economies, transnational corporations

Abstract

The article examines issues related to the inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI) to three countries that acceded to the European Union in the last decade, Poland, Czech and Hungary. These countries were chosen because they are considered transformational leaders of change, and also because, since the opening of their economies to the inflow of foreign capital, they have attracted the largest amount of direct investment among all the members from the region of Central and Eastern Europe. In this article we examine the extent to which the flow of FDI to Poland, Czech and Hungary was a result of the impact of traditional factors such as market size, labour costs or the openness of the economy, and in so far as it was based on a factor known as the “EU factor”. Empirical studies, based on data for the period 1996–2012, indicate that the signing of an association agreement with the EU has brought considerable transformational benefits to the countries in terms of FDI inflows. The impact of full membership in the European Union on the ability of countries to attract inward FDI stock is also assessed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agarwal J.P. [1980], Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment – A Survey, „Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv”, vol. 116, nr 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02696547.

Alam A., Shah S. [2013], Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in OECD Member Countries, „Journal of Economic Studies”, vol. 40, nr 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JES-10-2011-0132.

Barrios S., Dimelis S., Louri H., Strobl E. [2004], Efficiency Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment in the EU Periphery: A Comparative Study of Greece, Ireland, and Spain, „Review of World Economics”, vol. 140, nr 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02659620.

Bevan A., Estrin S., Meyer K. [2004], Foreign Investment Location and Institutional Development in Transition Economies, „International Business Review”, vol. 13, nr 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2003.05.005.

Bucevska V. [2009], Key Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: Empirical from Evidence the EU Candidate Countries. In Regional Cooperation and Integration Challenges and Opportunities, Proceedings from the Third International Conference, Skopje, October 15th–17th.

Casson M. [1990], The Theory of Foreign Direct Investment [w:] International Investment, ed. P. Buckley, Edward Elgar Pbl. Ltd, Aldershot.

Clausing K.A., Dorobantu C.L. [2005], Re-entering Europe: Does European Union Candidacy Boost Foreign Direct Investment?, „Economics of Transition”, vol. 13, nr 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2005.00208.x.

Dunning J.H. [1981], International Production and Multinational, George Allen & Unwin, London.

Dunning J.H. [1995], Reappraising the Eclectic Paradigm in an Age of Alliance Capitalism, „Journal of International Business Studies”, vol. 26, nr 3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490183.

Dunning J.H. [2003], The Role of Foreign Direct Investment in Upgrading China’s Competitiveness, „Journal of International Business and Economy”, vol. 4, nr 1.

Dunning J.H. [2004], Institutional Reform, FDI and European Transition Economies, Henley Business School University of Reading Whiteknights, United Kingdom, nr 014.

Dunning J.H. [2006], Towards a New Paradigm of Development: Implications for the Determinants International Business, „Transnational Corporations”, vol. 15, nr 1.

Ekonometria współczesna [2007], red. M. Osińska, Dom Organizatora, Toruń.

Galego A., Vieira C., Vieira I. [2004], The CEECs as FDI Attractors: Are They a Menace to the EU Periphery?, „Emerging Markets Finance and Trade”, vol. 40, nr 5.

Geldner M. [1986], Przyczynek do teorii zagranicznych inwestycji bezpośrednich, SGPiS, Warszawa.

Kalotay K. [2006], New Members in the European Union and Foreign Direct Investment, „Thunderbird International Business Review”, vol. 48, nr 4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tie.20106.

Kamiński B. [2001], How Accession to the European Union Has Affected External Trade and Foreign Direct Investment in Central European Economies, „Policy Research Working Paper”, nr 2578.

Maddala G.S. [2006], Ekonometria, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.

Narula R., Bellak C. [2009], EU Enlargement and Consequences for FDI Assisted Industrial Development. An Essay in Memory of Sanjaya Lall, „Transnational Corporations”, vol. 18, nr 2.

North D. [1990], Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Pilarska C. [2005], Bezpośrednie inwestycje zagraniczne w teorii ekonomii, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej, Kraków.

Przybylska K. [2001], Determinanty zagranicznych inwestycji bezpośrednich w teorii ekonomicznej. Empiryczna weryfikacja czynników lokalizacji zagranicznych inwestycji bezpośrednich w Czechach, Polsce i na Węgrzech, Seria Specjalna: Monografie, nr 144, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej, Kraków.

Rymarczyk J. [2004], Internacjonalizacja i globalizacja przedsiębiorstwa, PWE, Warszawa.

Walch N., Wörz J. [2012], The Impact of Country Risk Ratings and of the Status of EU Integration on FDI Inflows in CESEE Countries, OENB, Focus on European Economic Integration Q3/12.

Wawrzyniak D. [2010], Determinanty lokalizacji bezpośrednich inwestycji zagranicznych, „Gospodarka Narodowa”, nr 4.

Witkowska J. [1996], Bezpośrednie inwestycje zagraniczne w Europie Środkowowschodniej, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź.

Published

2016-03-29

Issue

Section

Articles